Why less is more and more is less (part two)

This is part two of a two part series on less is more photography. See part one, from last week, here. 

Less is more – less gear means better shots

Fear not, dear reader, for there is a cure to Gear Choice Paralysis – although some of you aren’t going to like it (at first). If we flip the narrative on More Is Less, we end up with Less Is More.

But how does that relate to your ongoing development, creative output, and gear choices?

While having every possible lens for a shoot is comforting and confidence-building, I argue you'll achieve far better results with fewer options.

Rather than packing all your lenses, limit yourself to one or two at most. Instead of walking out the door with a bag of primes, try using a single zoom that covers the same range. Of course, it’s genre-specific and working photographers may not have this level of luxury, but the math still applies.

The point is that less gear – especially lenses – significantly reduces Gear Choice Paralysis. You have fewer lenses to choose from and must make the lenses you have work for the light, composition, and moment.

You’re carrying less gear, but you’ll be more mindful and ready to capture magical moments.

At the same time, carrying a smaller, simpler kit lets you use a smaller camera bag, reducing strain on your body. While your overloaded camera bag may feel light enough when you test-fit it at home, it will quickly change the longer you carry it.

Being able to comfortably carry a light kit all day – without strain or ache – is a real blessing.

Having fewer lens options in your bag allows you to be more observant of light, composition, subjects, and changing scenery. The more observant you are, the more likely you’ll be ready for that shot of the day.

You can’t be truly observant when you are digging through the depths of your camera bag. Nor can you be truly present when your back and neck are aching, and you’re thinking about calling it quits.