AustralianPhotography

image doctor

Forest Cascade

Image Doctor: Forest Cascade

Photographer: Stuart Anstee

Added: 18-Jan-12

Camera Type: Olympus PEN EPL-1

Lens: Olympus 14 - 42 mm @ 26 mm

Shutter Speed: 15.0 seconds

Aperture: f 18

Adjustments: In the field I used an ND4 and ND8 filters to lengthen the exposure. The image was adjusted in PSE (camera RAW) with slight changes to the exposure, Black, Brightness and Clarity settings. The image was cropped to remove an area of dark shadow on the left and some rocks at the bottom of the image.

Photographer's Comments: This image of Horseshoe falls was taken on a recent trip to Mt Filed National park in Tasmania. Unfortunately only one side of the falls was really flowing when we were there. I am just taking up photography so I would appreciate your thoughts on this image and any advice or suggestions you have.

Image doctor's advice

Hi Stuart…

Waterfalls are popular subjects for many photographers but as you are discovering for yourself, timing is everything; if you show up after a week of rain then chances are they will look spectacular, but show up during a dry spell and most waterfalls will be a disappointment.

Given that you are new to photographing waterfalls I would suggest that this is not a bad attempt. I notice that you used two Neutral Density filters stacked on top of each other (an ND4 and an ND8) to get the exposure time down to 18 seconds. It may have been better to just use the ND8 filter. Ideally you want to limit the number of filters that you have in front of the lens because these can ultimately degrade the image with softening and internal reflections on the glass surfaces. Aside from that, I am uncertain you would notice too much difference between an 18 second exposure and a 5 second exposure in this situation.

What concerns me about this image is the very tight cropping. Tthere are times when tight cropping can be a good thing, but it is usually when you are looking to explore patterns or details within a subject. With this image you could have cropped in really tight (like removing another 80 percent of the image) just for the sake of capturing the veiling in the water near the top of the falls. There are times though, when you are better off allowing some breathing space around an image.

From your message I know you cropped this image tight to remove an area of dark shadowing on the left of the image but the fact is, that shadowing might have provided more real estate for the image to breath in. It might have also provided some good visual balance to this photograph; balance is an aesthetic tool that can work in a variety of ways, but in this instance it would have given the viewers eye an opportunity to move away from the bright water, indulge in the greenery for a moment and enjoy some darker shades before going back to the bright light again.

Now, there is one thing that you can do to improve this image as it stands at the moment. If you look at the original image you cannot help but feel like the top of the picture is level but that the bottom of the image is tilting off to the left. Open the image in Photoshop (or you can also do this in Adobe Camera RAW) and then go to the Lens Correction Tool. In this filter option you will find the Auto Correction control (used for automatically correcting known distortions in lenses), and the Custom setting (used for correcting geometric errors). In the Custom panel, go down to the Transform box and move the Horizontal Perspective to +10 and then shift the Angle by +0.50 degrees. Click OK, then crop the image to remove the empty sections of the image. The bottom of the image is now level.

Cheers, Anthony

 

Forest Cascade - Image Doctor's edited version

reader comments
  • Hi Stuart, My comment may seem harsh to you, but i hope you don't get offended. The image is you have posted is a newbie attempt to capture landscape. This image simply tells no story. Just a cropped waterfall. You should learn to frame and compose your image, and add a point of interest, in this image the waterfall itself, but I do not see any foreground or background which make the waterfall stand out. It looks like the water comes out of nowhere and goes to nowhere. In regards of the exposure it is good, there is a reasonable amount of detail in the shadows and highlights area. Keep on shooting, we all learn from our mistakes.
    Sotir Popovski on 17-Feb-12 03:38 PM

  • I love the photo except for the over exposure of the water at the centre of the flow, it seems to me to be too white "glaring" for want of a better word?
    Ray Young on 06-Feb-12 05:58 PM

Commenting

Hi, we welcome your comments.

You may comment as many times as you like. We approve and edit comments at our discretion. Do not send us comments that are:

  • abusive or malicious
  • off-topic or excessively long
  • blatantly spam.

By commenting you agree to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy . If you wish to alert us about a comment, contact us

Thank you and happy commenting!

add a comment







Leave this field empty

* Required field

Recent image doctor critiques

  • Not Talking

    Not Talking

    by Greg Harris

    This  is  a  nice  landscape,  though  it  could  be  even  better  if  you  could  pull  a  bit  more  life  out  of  those  lacklustre  clouds.  You  could  try  adding  a  graduated  more

  • Let Me Run

    Let Me Run

    by Kip Hobson

    I  don't  doubt  that  the  dog  is  itching  to  get  going,  but  as  for  feeling  cold,  that  sounds  more  like  you  -  quite  understandable  judging  by  this  shot.  This  captures  more

  • Rachel

    Rachel

    by Louise Bishop

    You  have  done  fine  to  get  those  skin  tones  looking  good,  and  the  shot  itself  is  nice  and  sharp.  Where  I  have  a  problem  is  the  use  of  flash  which  more

  • Untitled

    Untitled

    by Bob Shaw

    Yes,  you  can  be  quite  happy  with  your  result,  but  is  that  because  it  was  a  test  of  your  skills  or  because  you  really  liked  the  gimmicky  aspect  of  the  more